Started By
Message

re: What if Sumlin gave up on Kyle Allen after his first start?

Posted on 11/9/14 at 11:09 pm to
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98667 posts
Posted on 11/9/14 at 11:09 pm to
quote:

Wasn't Kenny Hill suspended for both of those games?


Yep. The only reason Allen played was because Sumlin didn't have a choice. But Rantards never let facts get in the way.
Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 11/9/14 at 11:56 pm to
Jim, Sumlin said immediately following the Alabama loss that he was considering the Change at qb.

We will see thanksgiving what happens when Hill is eligible what happens. But he's completely given Allen the he's out guy confidence status.. Something Miles would never do in fear of hurting his other guy.. After the Auburn game Miles even said Jennings was never benched.. I mean come on..
Posted by MrWiseGuy
Member since Dec 2009
27447 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 12:04 am to
quote:

Yep. The only reason Allen played was because Sumlin didn't have a choice. But Rantards never let facts get in the way.


Allen was named the starter prior to the suspension
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 11/10/14 at 6:40 am to
quote:

Yep. The only reason Allen played was because Sumlin didn't have a choice. But Rantards never let facts get in the way.
Actually Allen was named the starter against ULM and hill's 2 games suspension was announced afterwards.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram