Started By
Message

re: "Wealth Inequality in America: Its worse than you think" - Fortune

Posted on 10/31/14 at 3:12 pm to
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112799 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 3:12 pm to
I read the article and it doesn't address the basic question... Why is inequality bad?

If I make 10M a year what am I going to do with my riches? Only two choices: Spend it (good). Invest it (good). Both choices help the population at large.

The only scenarios where I can think that inequality is bad is in totalitarian states. North Korea in 1950 is poor. South Korea in 1950 is poor but has some crops. North Korea invades.

Same can be said with more developed states that are totalitarian. Resource wars. But in a nation like the US where the poor live like rich people in 3rd world countries there is no negative impact from inequality.
Posted by genro
Member since Nov 2011
61788 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 3:14 pm to
The negative impact is that humans are naturally jealous. So you encourage class warfare, buy off votes with union kickbacks and entitlements, and set yourself up as the plutocrats.
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
10704 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

I read the article and it doesn't address the basic question... Why is inequality bad?


Inequality is not bad in a society if A. all people have an equal opportunity to better themselves and B. we as a society agree that your basic needs should be a concern for all society i.e. you are not going hungry and you have a place to live and access to education and health care.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54754 posts
Posted on 10/31/14 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

I read the article and it doesn't address the basic question... Why is inequality bad?


Are you sure you read the article because it specifically posits:

quote:

So, why should we care that wealth inequality is so much greater than even the historic levels of income inequality? While inequality is a natural result of competitive, capitalist economies, there’s plenty of evidence that shows that extreme levels of inequality is bad for business. For instance, retailers are once again bracing for a miserable holiday shopping season due mostly to the fact that most Americans simply aren’t seeing their incomes rise and have learned their lesson about the consequences of augmenting their income with debt. Unless your business caters to the richest of the rich, opportunites for real growth are scarce.

Furthermore, there’s reason to believe that such levels of inequality can have even worse consequences. The late historian Tony Judt addressed these effects in Ill Fares the Land, a book on the consequences of the financial crisis, writing:

There has been a collapse in intergenerational mobility: in contrast to their parents and grandparents, children today in the UK as in the US have very little expectation of improving upon the condition into which they were born. The poor stay poor. Economic disadvantage for the overwhelming majority translates into ill health, missed educational opportunity, and—increasingly—the familiar symptoms of depression: alcoholism, obesity, gambling, and minor criminality.

In other words, there’s evidence that rising inequality and many other intractable social problems are related. Not only is rising inequality bad for business, it’s bad for society, too.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram