- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Woman defaces Yosemite, other parks with her crappy art
Posted on 10/24/14 at 7:29 am to stout
Posted on 10/24/14 at 7:29 am to stout
quote:I don't think there's any chance it would be as unanimous and angry as people are now if it were Banksy. It may not be overwhelming support, but it wouldn't be like this IMO.
Actually on her blog she is defending herself by saying if it was Bansky that did it people wouldn't be pissed.
1. Yes they would be
2.
quote:I don't think how good the art is is relevant.
2. She's about as close to being Banksy as Paige is to being a wholesome housewife
Posted on 10/24/14 at 8:28 am to shel311
quote:
I don't think there's any chance it would be as unanimous and angry as people are now if it were Banksy. It may not be overwhelming support, but it wouldn't be like this IMO.
Well, you're right and you're wrong. Slightly fewer people would be outraged, because the art would be better, but the consequences would be much worse for Banksy, not in terms of criminal prosecution, but in terms of public demand for his work and an international fervor for finding out who he is.
But Banksy paints old buildings and run down, man made areas, not natural features, to my knowledge. People who defend him say he's beautifying run down areas. They'd run for the hills if he did this.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News