- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Please explain the rationale for anchoring a thread about a Paul Krugman article
Posted on 10/21/14 at 4:49 pm to Reames239
Posted on 10/21/14 at 4:49 pm to Reames239
quote:1. Different committee votes on that. 2. If presidents are responsible for collateral damage then the Reps are in trouble. 3. Republucans are blocking the close of Gitmo. Wait until he does it with an EO and you'll see some fireworks.
Obama is a Nobel peace prize winner and has droned a bunch of kids and kept humans detained at Guantanamo even though he said he would close it.
Posted on 10/21/14 at 10:31 pm to Vegas Bengal
quote:
If presidents are responsible for collateral damage then the Reps are in trouble.
Because Bush did it.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
You are an interesting woman. You show total emotion when the GOP does something, yet when Hope n Change does it, it's A-OK
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrotflmao.gif)
fricking hack motherfricker. I bet you suck at driving a car.
Two weeks my lady.
Hope n Change = HOLY shite
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)