Yes she does, hypocrite. Her sex life is none of your business. I don't know where in the hell you think you get the moral right to knowledge of these personal details.

quote:
Oh and another thing. Why did she keep the stained dress? The only reason was to be able to prove to someone that it happened. Thus at some point she was going to release the info herself.

None of my or your business unless the party(ies) involved choose to share those details with me or you.

Mr. Clinton was censured for his actions, and the law never got involved with any of the actions of Ms. Lewinsky. It's none of our business at this point, and your words and actions regarding this issue are equally morally reprehensible as Monica's.

If you gossip about this and preach about morality, you are, by the dictionary definition of the word, a hypocrite. Be corrected and grow.

This post was edited on 10/21/14 at 12:24 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by TigerMyth36

River Ridge

Member since Nov 2005

39747 posts

Posted on 10/21/14 at 12:41 pm to ballscaster

quote:
If you gossip about this and preach about morality, you are, by the dictionary definition of the word, a hypocrite.

Don't think you understand the definition. Last time I checked, I didn't commit adultery in the white house.

You can argue, she has a right to privacy but once again, she blabbed to Linda Tripp. Do you think Clinton wanted her telling Linda? I guess Lewinsky is also guilty of breaking Clinton's confidence.

You keep using the words Moral Right, and no sir, she does not have a moral leg to stand on. Once again, she might deserve privacy, but she violated that herself.

1 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board