- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Texas Atty Gen and U of Houston law professor agree: City of Houston overreached
Posted on 10/17/14 at 5:37 pm to L.A.
Posted on 10/17/14 at 5:37 pm to L.A.
The pastors ended up not being involved in the lawsuit, and thus the subpoena was promptly bitch-slapped. That's pretty much what most said would happen.
This ruling isn't saying the subpoena would have been thrown out regardless of the involvement of the pastors and churches in the suit. Had they been, the subpoena would have been perfectly legal. This isn't some unilateral declaration that churches are free from legal precedent like some here were claiming.
This ruling isn't saying the subpoena would have been thrown out regardless of the involvement of the pastors and churches in the suit. Had they been, the subpoena would have been perfectly legal. This isn't some unilateral declaration that churches are free from legal precedent like some here were claiming.
This post was edited on 10/17/14 at 5:38 pm
Posted on 10/17/14 at 6:07 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:we have the Constitution for that....right?
This isn't some unilateral declaration that churches are free from legal precedent like some here were claiming.
Posted on 10/17/14 at 7:02 pm to Roger Klarvin
I think you have the discovery rules confused. How would 1st amendment rights change and sermons be discoverable even if the pastors were part of the suit?
This post was edited on 10/17/14 at 7:06 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News