- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Veritasium's 13 Misconceptions on Global Warming...
Posted on 9/23/14 at 12:06 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 9/23/14 at 12:06 pm to NC_Tigah
Fukushima was the worst nuclear industry accident in 25 years and the radiation death toll was zero. UNSCEAR puts the long-term death toll from cancer and birth defects at... zero. Given the alacrity with which you scrambled to Google for an examiner.com image purporting to show "radiation" (demarcated in centimeters, as you do) I'm sure you'll respond with some contradictory figures trawled from a junk science study from Greenpeace or RPHP. But on the other hand: no.
Meanwhile, how's the fossil fuel industry done since then? Well, the Soma coal explosion in Turkey killed 300 people, the Kaohsiung gas explosions in Taiwan killed another 30, the Megantic oil derailment in Quebec is good for another 47, the Sukhodilsk explosion is another 26, Bazhanov is 11, Chinese coal hoo boy let's add another 2,309 just for '12 and '13 (not counting post-Fukushima '11 or '14 to date) and this is just the industrial accidents. I'm not even counting the epidemiology, which is about 13,000 a year in deaths from particulate emissions in the US alone (mostly expressed through lung cancer rates) and in China... welp
Meanwhile, how's the fossil fuel industry done since then? Well, the Soma coal explosion in Turkey killed 300 people, the Kaohsiung gas explosions in Taiwan killed another 30, the Megantic oil derailment in Quebec is good for another 47, the Sukhodilsk explosion is another 26, Bazhanov is 11, Chinese coal hoo boy let's add another 2,309 just for '12 and '13 (not counting post-Fukushima '11 or '14 to date) and this is just the industrial accidents. I'm not even counting the epidemiology, which is about 13,000 a year in deaths from particulate emissions in the US alone (mostly expressed through lung cancer rates) and in China... welp
This post was edited on 9/23/14 at 12:09 pm
Posted on 9/23/14 at 12:43 pm to Iosh
quote:Silly.
the radiation death toll was zero.
Current predictions are the radiation released will cause ~130 cancer-related deaths (up to 1100).
quote:First Fukushima image that came up. Would have preferred a cartoon considering what I was responding to. Nothing more. Nothing less. Simple response to a thoroughly ridiculous post.
Given the alacrity with which you scrambled to Google for an examiner.com
quote:Yep. What could go wrong loading those folks up with Nuclear Plants.
the Sukhodilsk explosion is another 26
Brilliant!
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News