- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FBI 9MM Justification, FBI Training Division
Posted on 9/23/14 at 10:07 am to ctiger69
Posted on 9/23/14 at 10:07 am to ctiger69
quote:
ctiger69
I like where your head is at finding some very high powered, light-for-caliber defensive rounds.
But I don't like how you give 9mm such a weak offering. That velocity can easily be exceeded in a +P cartridge.
A +P Speer Gold Dot is doing 1220fps at the muzzle (straight from Speer's website). That would surely affect the muzzle energy you listed.
Posted on 9/23/14 at 10:23 am to bapple
quote:
I like where your head is at finding some very high powered, light-for-caliber defensive rounds. But I don't like how you give 9mm such a weak offering. That velocity can easily be exceeded in a +P cartridge. A +P Speer Gold Dot is doing 1220fps at the muzzle (straight from Speer's website). That would surely affect the muzzle energy you listed.
I agree. I was using 9 mm logic which is to use my 9 mm hot rounds vs standard rounds for 40, 45, and sig. But 9 mm fans get angry when this is done to them because it shows a huge gap in performance.
The 9 mm hot rounds will be right at 500. Good but a little short of the other three in the performance category.
I like 9 mm. I think it's a good caliber. It performs well. But I don't see the purpose of bashing the other 3 calibers (40. 45, 357 sig).
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News