- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: You be the admissions director
Posted on 9/22/14 at 9:05 pm to Iosh
Posted on 9/22/14 at 9:05 pm to Iosh
quote:There are major differences. Take a look at the Harvard Admissions Scattergraph posted earlier by anc.
The difference between a 160 and a 168 is far from stark. Half of that difference can be a single bad deduction in a logic game.
2
Posted on 9/22/14 at 9:24 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
There are major differences. Take a look at the Harvard Admissions Scattergraph posted earlier by anc.
Wow @ the person who got a 3.1 in school and nailed a 15 on the ACT and still got accepted into Harvard.
LOL @ the person with a 2.8 GPA who got a perfect score on either the SAT or ACT. That's exactly the untapped potential that thrives in Silicon Valley. There's people with 4.0 GPAs and perfect SATs who were also denied. I guess they didn't get diversity points.
This post was edited on 9/22/14 at 9:26 pm
Posted on 9/22/14 at 10:25 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:In what possible universe does a scattergraph on undergrad admissions remotely answer my point about law school?
There are major differences. Take a look at the Harvard Admissions Scattergraph posted earlier by anc.
Like, even if you hadn't simply conflated the two (hint: the LSAT is a wholly different beast than the SAT/ACT) it still wouldn't answer my point about its extremely limited predictive ability.
This post was edited on 9/22/14 at 10:27 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News