re: Jon Huntsman: Gay marriage is inevitable.

quote:

---

However, conditions that are inherently destructive and/or harm others (psychotic, pedohilia etc.) are not the same as being gay and being attracted toward the same sex.

---

"inherently destructive" can be in the eye of the beholder - that's what I'm saying. Once we step off the safe, dry ground of traditional one man/one woman marriage - the analysis will be on a case-by-case basis.

quote:

---

Nobody said you must accept and agree with every single human condition, even those that are harmful.

---

I think we're in agreement.

quote:

---

Being gay is as harmful to others as being left-handed is.

---

I think we're in agreement.

quote:

---

At the core of a libertarian argument would be to allow both adult incestuous marriage and polygamous marriage. Those consenting adults are not affecting anyone else.

---

Isn't this the next logical step? I mean what is the counter argument?