Started By
Message

re: White House: we're not at war with ISIS

Posted on 8/29/14 at 10:40 am to
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27832 posts
Posted on 8/29/14 at 10:40 am to
If he was pro-caliphate he wouldn't have been trying to force out Morsi for the past year or so. The rise of IS in Iraq is due to Morsi.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57446 posts
Posted on 8/29/14 at 10:44 am to
quote:

If he was pro-caliphate he wouldn't have been trying to force out Morsi for the past year or so. The rise of IS in Iraq is due to Morsi.


Nah. Obama initially hedged his bets on the Muslim Brotherhood. They were, literally, his guests of honor at his 2009 intro to the world Cairo speech.

Now, he'll take what he can get.
Posted by jeff5891
Member since Aug 2011
15761 posts
Posted on 8/29/14 at 10:44 am to
quote:

The rise of IS in Iraq is due to Morsi.
I disagree. This group is looking to create one Islamic state, which why they are gaining some many recruits. Hell they would have been fighting there if Sadam was still in power like they are in Syria
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 8/29/14 at 11:46 am to
Someone with better knowledge on this matter can certainly correct my following comment if it is wrong.

I seem to remember that all of the leaders in power during the Arab Spring were pretty secular and kept the Muslim Fundamentalists in check. Obama verbally encouraged and supported the overthrow of these individuals in the name of democracy but by doing so it also opened the doors for the fundamentalists to seize control.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram