- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Josh Gordon should we 2015?
Posted on 8/28/14 at 4:51 pm to RaginCajunsULL
Posted on 8/28/14 at 4:51 pm to RaginCajunsULL
First, the Browns have to cut Gordon for Gordon to sign with a CFL team; not the other way around. Gordon can sign everything but the CFL rules prohibit the contract unless he isn't on contract with an NFL team.
Second, Gordon remains on a quite cheap contract. And since Gordon is suspended for the entire year, the contract doesn't toll for this year and now runs until 2017.
Why would the Browns release him when they can hold his rights for free in case he manages to get back into the league next offseason?
Finally, Gordon would go on waivers and many teams would make a claim. We wouldn't be able to just sign him.
Second, Gordon remains on a quite cheap contract. And since Gordon is suspended for the entire year, the contract doesn't toll for this year and now runs until 2017.
Why would the Browns release him when they can hold his rights for free in case he manages to get back into the league next offseason?
Finally, Gordon would go on waivers and many teams would make a claim. We wouldn't be able to just sign him.
1
Posted on 8/28/14 at 8:10 pm to bbrownso
quote:Ridiculous.
First, the Browns have to cut Gordon for Gordon to sign with a CFL team; not the other way around. Gordon can sign everything but the CFL rules prohibit the contract unless he isn't on contract with an NFL team.
Second, Gordon remains on a quite cheap contract. And since Gordon is suspended for the entire year, the contract doesn't toll for this year and now runs until 2017.
Why would the Browns release him when they can hold his rights for free in case he manages to get back into the league next offseason?
Finally, Gordon would go on waivers and many teams would make a claim. We wouldn't be able to just sign him.
Browns will cut Gordon tomorrow and Saints got dibs.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News