Started By
Message

re: Least Favorite Kubrick Film

Posted on 8/22/14 at 10:24 am to
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
90939 posts
Posted on 8/22/14 at 10:24 am to
quote:

Peter Sellers has never brought a movie down.



The only thing that shocks me about Lolita is that it isn't better received - Mason gives, arguably, his best performance (maybe second to A Star is Born) and Sellers gives probably his second best effort (after the aforementioned Dr. Strangelove).

By the way, Sue Lyon is 68 years old this year - time just flies.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 8/22/14 at 10:36 am to
I feel like I've grown out of Kubrick. He's a wonderful visual stylist, and he makes some of the most beautiful movies ever put to film. That said, his movies are just so cold. He hasn't an ounce of humanity in him, it seems, and his characters rarely resemble anything approximating an actual human being. I've become much more humanist as I've grown older, and Kubrick, who really was the first director I truly loved, just doesn't appeal to me like he did when I was an Angry Young Man.

I'd say Barry Lyndon is my least favorite Kubrick, as it represents all of my problems with Kubrick. It is weighted down by a wooden performance by his lead actor, and his actions are just an excuse to shoot truly beautiful scenes. It's like the movie equivalent of Macbeth: full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

He's a technical master, but the man simply doesn't understand people. Nor does he even try. It's why he was the perfect director for AI. He cares more for the robots.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram