Started By
Message

re: Charges against Perry should wait until he is out of office - agree/disagree?

Posted on 8/18/14 at 10:38 am to
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36129 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 10:38 am to
quote:



Yes, because a Perry-appointed DA would immediately kill such an investigation in a clearly quid-pro-quo way


Yes. He would have. That's the entire point.

Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96816 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 10:42 am to
*facepalm*

Just because you think that is what would happen in your insane troll logic way does not mean that is what WOULD happen.


A new Travis County DA killing the investigation would have to justify doing so. A Perry appointee doing so would be EXTREMELY careful about crossing Ts and dotting Is because of what will inevitably be said about the investigation being killed.

Depending on how long this investigation has been going on and what has been turned up, it could be a silver bullet to kill Perry or it could be a horseshite fishing expedition which hadn't been killed only because of who they hoped to snare either directly or indirectly.


If it were a silver bullet, it would be extremely hard for a Perry appointee to kill it without ending up charged himself.

If it were a fishing expedition, there's no fricking reason to keep it open if they haven't turned anything up.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram