Started By
Message

re: Cali congressman wants to ban civilians from buying body armor

Posted on 8/13/14 at 11:17 am to
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96544 posts
Posted on 8/13/14 at 11:17 am to
quote:

I think you meant kevlar?


Whatever they had was an aramid of some type but NOT necessarily Kevlar. The source I found couldn't specify it past the aramid family.


quote:

Class III will stop handguns but to jim bob with a 7mm dear rifle you are dead and if they are a good shot just head or groin shoot them with a hand gun frick the police state that is California



The reason it was so effective for those two guys was that they had automatic weapons while the cops only had handguns and shotguns.

Kind of hard to hit a head shot with one of those at distance to begin with, let alone while two jackasses are unloading fully automatic AKs at you.


From Wiki-

quote:

However, aramid body armor worn by Phillips and Matasareanu covered all of their vitals (except their heads) while providing more bullet resistance than standard-issue police Kevlar vests, enabling them to deflect pistol bullets and shotgun pellets, while Matasareanu's chest armor even successfully withstood a hit from a SWAT operator's AR-15.
This post was edited on 8/13/14 at 11:19 am
Posted by Cracker
in a box
Member since Nov 2009
17778 posts
Posted on 8/13/14 at 9:59 pm to
practice
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram