Started By
Message

re: A what if and question about Iraq

Posted on 7/27/14 at 2:21 pm to
Posted by TT9
Global warming
Member since Sep 2008
82952 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

Lets say we did invade Afghanistan but never touched Iraq and Saddam Hussein was still dictator there would the middle east be more peaceful today than what it is right now, would there still be a big mess in Syria?
without question it would be more peaceful.
Posted by skeeter531
Member since Jun 2014
2415 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 2:29 pm to
Most definitely things would be more peaceful. The people there would still be living under tyrannical leaders but they kept the Islamists at bay and also "allowed" Christians to exist. Bush the elder was smart enough to leave Saddam in power. Khaddafi (spelling) would most likely still be in power too and Benghazi would never have happened...after all we were there, I'm certain, to funnel weapons to the "freedom fighters" in Syria, which in all of these places have been nothing but Muslim Brotherhood rebranded as Al Qaeda, ISIS, etc.
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
56330 posts
Posted on 7/27/14 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

without question it would be more peaceful.


explain.





also the turmoil in Iraq really started back after WWI when the allied powers broke up the ottoman empire into small countries they didn't pay attention to ethical borders or religious borders and so on and so forth.

In Iraq you have pretty much one radical leader trying to lead three completely different cultures and groups of people who are not very friendly to each other.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram