- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Update on battle for 18
Posted on 7/27/14 at 9:02 pm to tigeradam
Posted on 7/27/14 at 9:02 pm to tigeradam
quote:
Like I said, I don't know. There may be some other rule I don't know about, but I think it would be cool for Collins to get #18.
Ok, it seems like we go through this every year, but here is the rule and the reason why an O-lineman will never wear #18.
Rule 7, Section 1, Article 4-a-3
At least five linemen must wear jerseys numbered 50-79.
The penalty would be illegal formation, 5yds from the previous spot. For arguments sake, Collins could feasibly wear 18 IF there were five other linemen wearing 50-79 EVERY PLAY.
Lineman will just have to start their own number tradition. Maybe in a few yrs we can debate who should wear #70 (Ciron Black and Collins) have done well wearing it!
Posted on 7/28/14 at 2:18 pm to duboisd
quote:
Ok, it seems like we go through this every year, but here is the rule and the reason why an O-lineman will never wear #18.
Thanks! That's exactly what I was looking for. I've seen people just give a blanket statement that linemen can't wear #s outside the range, but hadn't seen the cite to the actual rule.
Agree on the new tradition with linemen.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconcheers.gif)
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)