- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would the Allies have won WWII without America getting involved?
Posted on 7/26/14 at 9:04 am to shinerfan
Posted on 7/26/14 at 9:04 am to shinerfan
quote:
The Russian rope-a-dope would have eventually worn Germany down but the sheer bodycount would have likely left the USSR too weakened to dominate Central and Eastern Europe for 45 years. And a protracted war could very well have allowed one or both sides to split the atom. and depopulate Europe.
This. The amount of material we gave the USSR let them stay in the fight and bleed out the Nazis. Without our support, it would have been a much longer war.
Hard to say which is better, let them fight it out and eventually use nukes on each other, or do what we did. Sure, Germany was evil, but the Soviet Union was no better.
LC
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)