- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Our young defensive front vs. Wisconsin's running game...
Posted on 6/29/14 at 9:21 pm to toughcrittercrumb
Posted on 6/29/14 at 9:21 pm to toughcrittercrumb
It should also be mentioned that Wisconsin won't be a finesse team like Oregon. They will act like we do when the opponent can't stop us running the ball down its throat. Wisconsin will run it down ours.
I don't know why so many of our fans seem to think that this is a walkover opponent. Wisconsin will not be intimidated by us at all.
I don't know why so many of our fans seem to think that this is a walkover opponent. Wisconsin will not be intimidated by us at all.
3
Posted on 6/29/14 at 9:23 pm to Eternally Undefeated
I only compared Wisky to Oregon because both teams are top 15 programs. Wisky is definitely a different style of team than Oregon.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 9:29 pm to Eternally Undefeated
I definitely don't think Wisky is a walkover opponent. They are very similar to us. Big and physical up front with a stout run game. I just take our depth (even though some are unproven) and athletic freaks over them.
Posted on 6/30/14 at 2:34 am to Eternally Undefeated
quote:
I don't know why so many of our fans seem to think that this is a walkover opponent. Wisconsin will not be intimidated by us at all.
They aren't walkovers, but our advantages beat their advantages. I'd concede 200 to Gordon and Clement because I watched them last year and that OL is nasty. Thing is, they have QB problems and pass catcher problems and they are not as talented as us to cover them. Does it matter if our DTs are inexperienced? We are loaded at corner so we can stack 8 in the box the majority of the time. We are stout at DE starters and our 3 deep at LB is ridiculous. Not only are we loaded at LB and go 3 deep at RB (anybody still saying wait til Fournette hits the field, just freaking stahp), their entire front 7 is new.
RBs
push
OL
push
DL
LSU
LB
overwhelmingly LSU
WRs
LSU (because of talent)
TEs
push but could be LSU
DBs
LSU by talent and experience
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News