Started By
Message

re: Hypothetical legal question regarding a driving scenario

Posted on 6/29/14 at 3:47 pm to
Posted by LSUtoOmaha
Nashville
Member since Apr 2004
26591 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 3:47 pm to
Regardless of what the law is, B should be at fault for causing a situation to occur in the first place. A wreck was going to happen, either A vs B or A vs C. Blaming A for essentially taking one or the other is absurd.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
48198 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

Regardless of what the law is
well how do you propose they settle it?

you can't prove B caused A to hit C if B didn't touch anybody and then drives away bc he wasn't in an accident. that opens up a can of worms legally
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram