- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trademark board rules against Washington Redskins name
Posted on 6/18/14 at 11:28 am to H.M. Murdock
Posted on 6/18/14 at 11:28 am to H.M. Murdock
quote:
Well, the 1st amendment of the constitution gives the company the protection to use whatever name they see fit. The patent office, as an extension of the fed gov cannot limit the 1a. This will go to court.
No, it doesn't. The first Amendment gives the company the right to use whatever name it sees fit.
The US Trademark Office gives a company an exclusive right to use a name and gives a company the ability to enforce that right in court. And now it has decided that that giving the team the exclusive right to the word "Redskins" was a mistake.
This ruling doesn't say that the team can't refer to itself as the Redskins. It just means that they can't sue someone for making a shirt with the word "Redskins" on it because no one can own a trademark that is disparaging to people.
Here's the ruling:
LINK
Posted on 6/18/14 at 11:38 am to deSandman
quote:
It just means that they can't sue someone for making a shirt with the word "Redskins" on it because no one can own a trademark that is disparaging to people.
Here's the ruling:
LINK
That certainly doesn't sound like a reckless over-reach of government power. So based on this ruling every "offended" party in the world can invalidate their enemy's trademarks.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)