Started By
Message

re: Trademark board rules against Washington Redskins name

Posted on 6/18/14 at 11:28 am to
Posted by deSandman
Member since Mar 2007
969 posts
Posted on 6/18/14 at 11:28 am to
quote:

Well, the 1st amendment of the constitution gives the company the protection to use whatever name they see fit. The patent office, as an extension of the fed gov cannot limit the 1a. This will go to court.


No, it doesn't. The first Amendment gives the company the right to use whatever name it sees fit.
The US Trademark Office gives a company an exclusive right to use a name and gives a company the ability to enforce that right in court. And now it has decided that that giving the team the exclusive right to the word "Redskins" was a mistake.
This ruling doesn't say that the team can't refer to itself as the Redskins. It just means that they can't sue someone for making a shirt with the word "Redskins" on it because no one can own a trademark that is disparaging to people.

Here's the ruling:
LINK
Posted by jtmiller02
Member since Jan 2013
114 posts
Posted on 6/18/14 at 11:38 am to
quote:

It just means that they can't sue someone for making a shirt with the word "Redskins" on it because no one can own a trademark that is disparaging to people.

Here's the ruling:
LINK


That certainly doesn't sound like a reckless over-reach of government power. So based on this ruling every "offended" party in the world can invalidate their enemy's trademarks.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram