- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BLM vs. Nevada Rancher
Posted on 4/22/14 at 1:38 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
Posted on 4/22/14 at 1:38 pm to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
What is your point? Are you disagreeing with my statement that sometimes it's worth more than the back rent to remove an intransigent tenant?
Yes, unless and as I mentioned, there are VERY unique circumstances. You mentioned you have never had to remove a tenant so what are you basing your claim on? Under typical circumstances, it cost next to nothing to legally remove them. You might incur a lot of costs after removing them in repairs,etc. but you would have had those expenses anyway. I am asserting that the cost of REMOVAL in and of itself, is very little.
This post was edited on 4/22/14 at 1:39 pm
0
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News