Started By
Message

re: BLM vs. Nevada Rancher

Posted on 4/22/14 at 11:37 am to
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
81481 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 11:37 am to
quote:

They don't want to apprehend him, they want to remove his cattle from public lands.



Ummmm, so now the story changes? I thought they wanted to apprehend the cattle in order to sell them off and recoup the million that he owed in back fees?
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 11:44 am to
quote:

They don't want to apprehend him


quote:

Ummmm, so now the story changes? I thought they wanted to apprehend the cattle

Then don't change the story. They want to remove the cattle from public lands (and do whatever, sell them for back 'rent', sell then and give the proceeds to the rancher, it's irrelevant, they cannot wait for the cattle to show up at the Feed Store to 'bring them in' as you suggested they do.) They do NOT want to apprehend Bundy personally - not to my knowledge anyway. I believe this is all a civil matter, and not a criminal one. I could be wrong on that.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram