Started By
Message

re: BLM vs. Nevada Rancher

Posted on 4/22/14 at 11:13 am to
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 11:13 am to
quote:

My point is that I don't think the Govt should use force like that for non-violent offenders. If he had killed multiple people and was likely to do it again, ok, you go in with force.

He's armed and he threatened violence against the gov't before they showed up with the SWAT teams. He's also refused to recognize the authority of the federal gov't. I wouldn't be showing up with a pencil and pad to issue cease and desist order to the guy. They told him to remove the cattle. He refused. they told him if he didn't remove the cattle, they would. He threatened violence if they tried it. They came in with overwhelming force to execute the removal of the cattle - and then backed down. I don't see the government acting wrongfully here.

I believe that it may have been the court that acted wrongfully - just as in the Waco case - and just as in the Elian Gonzales case.
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 11:15 am to
quote:

He's armed and he threatened violence against the gov't before they showed up with the SWAT teams.


do you have a link for this?
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80383 posts
Posted on 4/22/14 at 11:15 am to
quote:

He's armed and he threatened violence against the gov't before they showed up with the SWAT teams.


But why show up with SWAT teams?

The dude obviously leaves the property to go to the local store or whatnot. Apprehend him when he is by himself.

The Govt wanted to swing their big dicks the same as he wanted to. Instead they should have used common fricking sense and avoided this clusterfrick.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram