- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tensions rise in Nevada-snipers,1st am zones,no fly zones used and in effect
Posted on 4/12/14 at 12:04 pm to Rex
Posted on 4/12/14 at 12:04 pm to Rex
"It's quite hilarious what you consider "points" within the debate over whether Mr. Bundy is in the legal right over the grazing issue and the impound of his cattle. Are you going to quote the price of tea in China next? "
When this started I said Mr. Bundy has had his rights violated. You chose to continuously recite the issues of legal grazing rights and personal insults towards this guy. You are a good, little narrow-minded partisan. You really should pay closer attention dumbass.
When this started I said Mr. Bundy has had his rights violated. You chose to continuously recite the issues of legal grazing rights and personal insults towards this guy. You are a good, little narrow-minded partisan. You really should pay closer attention dumbass.
This post was edited on 4/12/14 at 12:08 pm
Posted on 4/12/14 at 12:08 pm to Paluka
He might figure it out, when you have a steak in one hand and a shotgun in the other and he looks hungry and lost
Posted on 4/12/14 at 12:15 pm to Paluka
Your very first point in this exchange, by your admission, was Article 1-8-17 of the Constitution.
When you were shown to be incorrect on that matter you moved on to the equal footing doctrine.
You were shown to be incorrect on that matter, too.
If this wasn't about Mr. Bundy's right to the land you sure wasted a lot of typing. Why is that?
You have made several incorrect assertions about the law and now try to hide behind some irrelevancies. Can't say I didn't enjoy correcting you, though. Thanks.
When you were shown to be incorrect on that matter you moved on to the equal footing doctrine.
You were shown to be incorrect on that matter, too.
If this wasn't about Mr. Bundy's right to the land you sure wasted a lot of typing. Why is that?
You have made several incorrect assertions about the law and now try to hide behind some irrelevancies. Can't say I didn't enjoy correcting you, though. Thanks.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News