- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tensions rise in Nevada-snipers,1st am zones,no fly zones used and in effect
Posted on 4/12/14 at 11:48 am to Paluka
Posted on 4/12/14 at 11:48 am to Paluka
Is he a deadbeat? Yes.
Has he refused to pay the fines to the state or county? Irrelevant.
Have you read the court documents yet? No.
Will you be able to find them and access them? I have no desire to read them. News agency summations are sufficient.
His position is quite deliberate. Agree or disagree? Deliberate, self-serving, and legally unsustainable.
What about my use of the voter I.D. laws and your own position on them? Not relevant to this thread.
Why have the feds violated his first amendment rights? For their own safety, obviously. I never said I agreed with the use of their "first amendment zones", but that matter is irrelevant to the question of whether or not he's entitled to graze his cattle on Federal land.
Did you know the county sheriff can make the feds leave legally? Irrelevant to the matter of whether or not Bundy is entitled to graze his cattle on Federal land.
Did you know it is illegal for the feds to be pointing weapons at this guy from afar? No, it's not, but nobody has established that as a fact, anyway. Nor is it relevant to the matter of whether or not Bundy is entitled to graze his cattle on Federal land.
How many more laws have been violated by the feds in this situation than the Bundy guy? Care to guess? No, I do not care to guess.
It's quite hilarious what you consider "points" within the debate over whether Mr. Bundy is in the legal right over the grazing issue and the impound of his cattle. Are you going to quote the price of tea in China next?
Has he refused to pay the fines to the state or county? Irrelevant.
Have you read the court documents yet? No.
Will you be able to find them and access them? I have no desire to read them. News agency summations are sufficient.
His position is quite deliberate. Agree or disagree? Deliberate, self-serving, and legally unsustainable.
What about my use of the voter I.D. laws and your own position on them? Not relevant to this thread.
Why have the feds violated his first amendment rights? For their own safety, obviously. I never said I agreed with the use of their "first amendment zones", but that matter is irrelevant to the question of whether or not he's entitled to graze his cattle on Federal land.
Did you know the county sheriff can make the feds leave legally? Irrelevant to the matter of whether or not Bundy is entitled to graze his cattle on Federal land.
Did you know it is illegal for the feds to be pointing weapons at this guy from afar? No, it's not, but nobody has established that as a fact, anyway. Nor is it relevant to the matter of whether or not Bundy is entitled to graze his cattle on Federal land.
How many more laws have been violated by the feds in this situation than the Bundy guy? Care to guess? No, I do not care to guess.
It's quite hilarious what you consider "points" within the debate over whether Mr. Bundy is in the legal right over the grazing issue and the impound of his cattle. Are you going to quote the price of tea in China next?
Posted on 4/12/14 at 12:04 pm to Rex
"It's quite hilarious what you consider "points" within the debate over whether Mr. Bundy is in the legal right over the grazing issue and the impound of his cattle. Are you going to quote the price of tea in China next? "
When this started I said Mr. Bundy has had his rights violated. You chose to continuously recite the issues of legal grazing rights and personal insults towards this guy. You are a good, little narrow-minded partisan. You really should pay closer attention dumbass.
When this started I said Mr. Bundy has had his rights violated. You chose to continuously recite the issues of legal grazing rights and personal insults towards this guy. You are a good, little narrow-minded partisan. You really should pay closer attention dumbass.
This post was edited on 4/12/14 at 12:08 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)