- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who would win between Rome and Ancient China?
Posted on 3/30/14 at 9:12 am to biglego
Posted on 3/30/14 at 9:12 am to biglego
quote:
True but its still a stretch to call a confederate soldier one of history's three greatest
I am not sure who you would put above the three I mentioned. The argument could be made for maybe including the Spartan, but I cant imagine who else that you would think is better. I am curious, maybe this subject needs its own thread to get more input.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 9:22 am to bencoleman
The Norse/Normans/Scandinavians would definitely be at the top. The Slavs, especially Cossacks and Russians, are great warriors and downright brutal. The Soviets singlehandedly defeated the Axis powers of Europe in WW2.
The Afrikaners/Boers were mentioned as the most rugged and noble warriors by Winston Churchill, but there weren't too many of them.
The Afrikaners/Boers were mentioned as the most rugged and noble warriors by Winston Churchill, but there weren't too many of them.
Posted on 3/30/14 at 9:51 am to bencoleman
There are plenty soldiers who accomplished more impressive feats. Spartans as you mention. But there's no reason to think a confederate soldier was better than a Mongol, Crusader, Macedonian, or 1500s Spaniard. It's hard to compare with pre-gunpowder soldiers but the confederate soldier was a poorly trained, hungry farmboy compared to the professional soldiers in history.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News