- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "Inner Loop" being studied, Mayor has a mad legislature wasn't clued in
Posted on 3/27/14 at 9:29 am to Geauxld Finger
Posted on 3/27/14 at 9:29 am to Geauxld Finger
I don't think they'd eliminate signals. Maybe some smaller ones. But the major ones would have to remain. The operations would change...like, Michigan left turns, etc.
Here's the original Inner Loop article from four days ago.
Here's the original Inner Loop article from four days ago.
1
Posted on 3/27/14 at 9:43 am to The Sad Banana
quote:
I don't think they'd eliminate signals. Maybe some smaller ones. But the major ones would have to remain. The operations would change...like, Michigan left turns, etc.
Well then frick that. If it's not true limited access, then what's the point? Build overpasses over the major intersections if necessary... the biggest ones (I-110, Plank Rd., Greenwell Springs Rd., Florida Blvd., and I-12) already have interstate-style interchanges, if they have to elevate a stretch between Florida Blvd. and I-12, then go for it... or just build overpasses to take the new road over the major intersections and have the minor intersections feed into the service road, where they can hang a right and then u-turn or do whatever.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News