- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Conservative Myth of a Social Safety Net Built on Charity
Posted on 3/24/14 at 4:44 pm to FT
Posted on 3/24/14 at 4:44 pm to FT
quote:
And we didn't give up sending letters the moment email was created.
quote:yes. No one is going to help their neighbor when a) they are already surrending 30-50% of their income and b) there is "someone else" to do it.
Until charities are able to realistically supplant the work that government does, is it even moderately intelligent to advocate getting rid of all of it?
I keep asking the question: "would you let your neighbor starve, or go without lifesaving surgery". No one wants to answer the question, oddly.
quote:Indeed. It all looks good when you only examine half of the equation. No one ever seems to want to count the hopes and dreams squashed because a middle-income family cannot afford college for their children, or take care of grandma because they are surrendering so much to the federal government.
The article isn't about the abuse you can find in these programs.
quote:Well, what it says it that we don't have the charitable society we'd like to think we have. Forcibly removing income tends to make people LESS generous over time. None of this should be surprising.
It's about charity's inability to solve the problems many think they can.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News