Started By
Message

re: The ramblings of a St. George opponent

Posted on 3/10/14 at 10:33 am to
Posted by alfredblueforheisman
Member since Aug 2010
974 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 10:33 am to
quote:

How can you keep saying that when it has worked so well for central and Zachary? There are 2 good, recent examples of the success that proSG people are trying to achieve. It's been done already, twice, and it works. Did you complain like this when Central broke away? How about Zachary?


I'm not complaining. I'm just not for it. Just because it worked in other situations doesn't mean it will work this time. I don't trust it, nor do I trust the people spear heading it. And there is no way the funding will be there in this situation, IMO. That's why i'm against it.

Maybe if they are more prepared in a couple years, I could be for it. My kids will always be in catholic schools anyway, so I guess that's why i'm not super involved in this.

I am 100% in support of St. George FD getting the necessary funding they need from the existing city of BR. That should be able to be done with the system that is currently in place.
Posted by MRTigerFan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
4639 posts
Posted on 3/10/14 at 10:40 am to
quote:

alfredblueforheisman

So you don't trust the people leading the SG breakaway? Which ones in particular? What did they do for you to not trust them? And how can you say that the funding will not be there? The tax revenue for SG will exceed the current average tax revenue for BR. Sure there might be some initial cash flow issues but the tax revenue will not be a problem.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram