Started By
Message

re: Radioactivity heading toward California - where is the media?

Posted on 2/28/14 at 5:25 pm to
Posted by davidsheroes
Los Angeles
Member since May 2007
3596 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

Physicians for Social Responsibility has insisted there is no safe level of exposure to radionuclides, regardless of the fact that we encounter them naturally:
There is no safe level of radionuclide exposure, whether from food, water or other sources. Period,” said Jeff Patterson, DO, immediate past president of Physicians for Social Responsibility. “Exposure to radionuclides, such as iodine-131 and cesium-137, increases the incidence of cancer. For this reason, every effort must be taken to minimize the radionuclide content in food and water.”


Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

Physicians for Social Responsibility has insisted there is no safe level of exposure to radionuclides, regardless of the fact that we encounter them naturally:
There is no safe level of radionuclide exposure, whether from food, water or other sources. Period,


I guess they must not like bananas, which are naturally very mildly radioactive.
Posted by shawnlsu
Member since Nov 2011
23682 posts
Posted on 2/28/14 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

said Jeff Patterson, DO, immediate past president of Physicians for Social Responsibility


Chances this guy voted for Obama? 100%+ ?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram