Started By
Message

re: Marijauna's first overdose?

Posted on 2/2/14 at 12:15 pm to
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 2/2/14 at 12:15 pm to
I fully expect the reefers to be subject to the same rules as drinkers though.

I've seen some stoned people and there's no way they were any better off behind the wheel than a case-deep redneck. There should be some ultra-strict rule regarding how high you can be and drive.

Otherwise, make it legal. People are going to get it and buy it no matter what. Might as well tax it and let american farmers grow it.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171087 posts
Posted on 2/2/14 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

I've seen some stoned people and there's no way they were any better off behind the wheel than a case-deep redneck.



studies show differently. not saying it's safe to drive stoned, but it's far less dangerous than driving drunk. it's been shown that stoned drivers compensate for their impairment by driving slower, paying closer attention, etc. drunks don't do that.


again, not saying it's safe, but the comparison to drunk driving as if they're equals is not valid
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 2/2/14 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

I've seen some stoned people and there's no way they were any better off behind the wheel than a case-deep redneck. There should be some ultra-strict rule regarding how high you can be and drive.
I absolutely agree. I don't think you'll hear anyone defend driving absolutely stoned. Just like drinking, there is a limit where you have no business driving.
quote:

People are going to get it and buy it no matter what. Might as well tax it and let american farmers grow it.
Also agree.
This post was edited on 2/2/14 at 12:19 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram