Started By
Message

re: College Football Playoff using top 4 Conference winners: BCS era

Posted on 12/17/13 at 12:35 am to
Posted by Zamoro10
Member since Jul 2008
14743 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 12:35 am to
quote:

I'd really rather 16 where all 11 conference winners get auto bids and 5 at large


I could adapt - and I think we'd all get used to it after much moaning about the regular season being diminished.

The reason I'd be open to this - is because of my strong belief that the regular season SHOULD matter...meaning...winning conferences should mean something again...accomplishments on the field - instead of this constant subjective eyeball test.

Every conference champ should get a shot - get a seat at the table...that makes the regular season really mean something again...and then you can throw in your Bama's and Notre Dame's and Oklahoma's - at-large who for whatever reason (tough conference, no conference, big game floppers) didn't win their conference.

Conferences need to be like divisions in the NFL - to have relevance anymore beyond some amorphous regional pride nonsense.
This post was edited on 12/17/13 at 12:36 am
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59135 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 12:53 am to
quote:

Zamoro10


That pretty much sums up why I'm good with that format. I think 4 is better, but if you insist on expansion, just go all the way. Making winning your conference meaningful, give all D1 teams a shot .
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram