Started By
Message

re: Skip Bayless: "What beats a Super Bowl in the Superdome?"

Posted on 12/12/13 at 10:56 am to
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30490 posts
Posted on 12/12/13 at 10:56 am to
quote:

I disagree. It's one of the things that makes football unique. Rain, shine, sleet, or snow, the game will be played.



cept lightning. lightning = no go
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
23429 posts
Posted on 12/12/13 at 11:00 am to
There is merit to both sides of this argument

Southerners are quick to point out that teams from the north can't deal with the humidity etc in the summer/fall, so should we get rid of that too? It's the same argument on its head.

I think there are strange things that happen in the cold, when it is windy etc. But I kind of like that. It neutralizes the passing offenses, which is kind of what "old school smash mouth" fans like, but that is not what the NFL is today.

I think the CFB playoff could see a title game in the north within the decade, since from what I've read "all" cities can host. A NCG in Beaver Stadium or at Camp Randall on Jan 7?
This post was edited on 12/12/13 at 11:01 am
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
27496 posts
Posted on 12/12/13 at 11:01 am to
quote:

cept lightning. lightning = no go

That is different. You can't put people in danger of getting electrocuted.

I'm saying they don't stop the game due to weather just because it's uncomfortable to play in or you might not play as well with a bunch of snow on the ground.

They stop the game for serious things like lightning. But they aren't going to stop the game because the weather may impact performance.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram