- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Since when is 'confirmed' the lingo for incorrectly ruling a replay?
Posted on 11/30/13 at 8:58 pm to Louie T
Posted on 11/30/13 at 8:58 pm to Louie T
quote:
Confirm means they have enough to say call is correct as called on field. Stands means they don't have enough to overturn but they don't necessarily agree with the call on the field.
Yes that's what is constantly drilled into our heads. But when a receiver catches a ball, takes 3 steps, and loses the ball after his knees and elbow hit the ground and your replay review "confirms" that he didn't catch the ball, the above is no longer true.
The same thing happened in the ohio st michigan game with a fumble. I want to say ohio st fumbled and michigan recovered, but he was ruled down. They reviewed the play, replays showed a fumble, they "confirmed" the call on the field.
This post was edited on 11/30/13 at 8:59 pm
Posted on 11/30/13 at 9:00 pm to Open Your Eyes
quote:
The thing happened in the ohio st michigan game with a fumble. I want to say ohio st fumbled and michigan recovered, but he was ruled down. They reviewed the play, replays showed a fumble, they "confirmed" the call on the field.
You got it completely wrong. UM fumbled and OSU recovered. He was obviously down. It was ruled a fumble and confirmed a fumble by replay.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News