- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: No charges filed against Jameis Winston
Posted on 11/23/13 at 11:20 am to League Champs
Posted on 11/23/13 at 11:20 am to League Champs
quote:
11/22/2013 - Winstons lawyer admits that he did indeed engage with victim in sexual activity, first claiming it was consenual. But later would not say that the victim had given consent when pressed by reporters
Interesting.
Posted on 11/23/13 at 11:22 am to crimsonsaint
quote:
11/22/2013 - Winstons lawyer admits that he did indeed engage with victim in sexual activity, first claiming it was consenual. But later would not say that the victim had given consent when pressed by reporters
Interesting.
We already covered that. Contrary to what some would have you believe, Jameis Winston's attorney did not admit his client had nonconsensual sex.
The exchange:
So are you confirming that DNA matched your client? I can't confirm anything because I haven't seen it, but I'm not surprised by the results because we fully anticipated that his DNA may be there, but that has nothing to do with him being exonerated.
So you are saying this was consensual? Absolutely.
So, they had sex and this was consensual? I'm not saying that. I'm saying the eyewitnesses who were there will verify that any material that is found is consistent with him (JW) doing nothing wrong.
EDIT: He says shortly after that he does not want to comment on the facts of the case.
Starts at 5:30
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)