Started By
Message

re: No charges filed against Jameis Winston

Posted on 11/23/13 at 11:20 am to
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37278 posts
Posted on 11/23/13 at 11:20 am to
quote:

11/22/2013 - Winstons lawyer admits that he did indeed engage with victim in sexual activity, first claiming it was consenual. But later would not say that the victim had given consent when pressed by reporters


Interesting.
Posted by Archie Bengal Bunker
Member since Jun 2008
15520 posts
Posted on 11/23/13 at 11:22 am to
quote:

11/22/2013 - Winstons lawyer admits that he did indeed engage with victim in sexual activity, first claiming it was consenual. But later would not say that the victim had given consent when pressed by reporters


Interesting.



We already covered that. Contrary to what some would have you believe, Jameis Winston's attorney did not admit his client had nonconsensual sex.



The exchange:

So are you confirming that DNA matched your client? I can't confirm anything because I haven't seen it, but I'm not surprised by the results because we fully anticipated that his DNA may be there, but that has nothing to do with him being exonerated.

So you are saying this was consensual? Absolutely.

So, they had sex and this was consensual? I'm not saying that. I'm saying the eyewitnesses who were there will verify that any material that is found is consistent with him (JW) doing nothing wrong.

EDIT: He says shortly after that he does not want to comment on the facts of the case.


Starts at 5:30
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram