- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

LSU programs worse loss Saban or Emmert?
Posted on 11/12/13 at 1:58 pm
Posted on 11/12/13 at 1:58 pm
Mark Emmert. Someone asked the question who would the fans hire to replace Miles? The question should be who would the (good old boys) hire to replace Miles? They hired Miles because he is the opposite of Saban. Emmert gave Saban an open check book to carry out his vision for building the program. The (good old boys) were missing out on the usual (lining of the pockets) so if for some reason they felt they HAD to make a change he would be Like Miles, not Saban. They will need to be able to pull the strings with the new coach just like the present coach.
Posted on 11/12/13 at 1:59 pm to Paul Harvey
Great stuff, Paul. Now how about fleshing it out with some verifyable facts and figures. I know you have them because you would never post something that you can't back up.

This post was edited on 11/12/13 at 2:01 pm
Posted on 11/12/13 at 2:02 pm to Paul Harvey
Did Emmert do the same thing for Washington? Was he even there when they hired Sarkisian? Have their facilities improved dramatically?
Posted on 11/12/13 at 2:02 pm to Paul Harvey
I don't think "or" belongs here. Even most of the Bama alumni I know will even admit that it works to Saban's advantage to have Emmert in the NCAA President's chair. Saban has some "techniques" when it comes to recruiting, and Emmert doesn't seem to mind.
Posted on 11/12/13 at 2:10 pm to Paul Harvey
Emmert was a huge loss for LSU, but not that big a deal for the football program. People forget that Mark hired Tyrone Willingham at Washington
Posted on 11/12/13 at 2:11 pm to Paul Harvey
They didn't hire Miles because he was the opposite of Saban. Why would they do that, we didn't run Saban out of town, he got an opportunity to coach in the NFL. The other candidates were petrino and Jack Del Rio who are both very different from Miles.
I think Emmert was a very knowledgeable president and was a definite loss, but Saban is the difference maker... Would love to have either one back.
I think Emmert was a very knowledgeable president and was a definite loss, but Saban is the difference maker... Would love to have either one back.
Posted on 11/12/13 at 2:17 pm to Paul Harvey
Everyone that knows you really doesn't like you and talks about how stupid you are when you aren't around.
Posted on 11/12/13 at 2:26 pm to Paul Harvey
quote:What does this mean exactly? (in terms of when they hired Miles)
They hired Miles because he is the opposite of Saban.
quote:Miles is the 7th highest paid coach in CFB. The good ole boys have opened their pockets pretty well I'd say.
The (good old boys) were missing out on the usual (lining of the pockets) so if for some reason they felt they HAD to make a change he would be Like Miles, not Saban
quote:Who is "they" and what "strings" are they pulling with Miles?
They will need to be able to pull the strings with the new coach just like the present coach.
Thanks
Popular
Back to top
8









