Started By
Message

re: post quality review for kashonly

Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:23 pm to
Posted by Hugo Stiglitz
Member since Oct 2010
72937 posts
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

if walt got banned for poor post quality,

I don't see what one poster's banning has anything to do with another poster's post quality review.

"Oh, this guy made me laugh but got banned so anyone who doesn't entertain me enough should be considered for banning as well."

Don't get me wrong, Kash sucks sometimes but that's no grounds for suspension IMO.
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66523 posts
Posted on 10/18/13 at 2:26 pm to
quote:

"Oh, this guy made me laugh but got banned so anyone who doesn't entertain me enough should be considered for banning as well."


what? not what im saying at all.

Walt's post quality is far better than kash's, so if walt got banned for his poor quality, than kash should be as well.

Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 10/19/13 at 7:04 pm to
This.

Quality is relative.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram