- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LA bear population estimated to be at 500 (ETA now 499)
Posted on 8/6/13 at 6:24 am to Tigerpaw123
Posted on 8/6/13 at 6:24 am to Tigerpaw123
I do not know how many bear are in the state of Louisiana. What I do know is a federal biologist told me years ago that if they released the actual numbers on the Louisiana Black Bear 2 things would happen.
1. The biologist were in fear of losing their funding and may be sent to another part of the country to study a different species.
2. The public would demand something be done to limit the numbers in their area. According to the fellow I was speaking with this notion comes from fear and simple lack of understanding by the general public.
What I got from that conversation was that the biologist and others in the black bear community have set their roots in this part of the world.(Kids in school, become members of a local church, involved in the community....ect.) They do not want to pack and leave in the middle of their life. The other thing I grabbed is what makes me angry. The whole "We are with the government and we know what is best" type attitude. The only way to sway the opinion of the general public is to make those people comfortable or find a way to profit from the issue. The federal wildlife has done neither. I am hole heartedly against the feds dishing out money to make folks happy so I think some education efforts might ease the concerns of John Q. Public.
My conversation with the federal biologist was on the banks of the Tensas where he was setting a trap for a nuisance bear in 1999-00ish.
1. The biologist were in fear of losing their funding and may be sent to another part of the country to study a different species.
2. The public would demand something be done to limit the numbers in their area. According to the fellow I was speaking with this notion comes from fear and simple lack of understanding by the general public.
What I got from that conversation was that the biologist and others in the black bear community have set their roots in this part of the world.(Kids in school, become members of a local church, involved in the community....ect.) They do not want to pack and leave in the middle of their life. The other thing I grabbed is what makes me angry. The whole "We are with the government and we know what is best" type attitude. The only way to sway the opinion of the general public is to make those people comfortable or find a way to profit from the issue. The federal wildlife has done neither. I am hole heartedly against the feds dishing out money to make folks happy so I think some education efforts might ease the concerns of John Q. Public.
My conversation with the federal biologist was on the banks of the Tensas where he was setting a trap for a nuisance bear in 1999-00ish.
Posted on 8/6/13 at 6:36 am to Choirboy
This is very similar to what happened with the alligator population estimates. 1 year there was worry of a declining population, then the next year we couldn't kill them fast enough.
Posted on 8/6/13 at 8:03 am to Choirboy
quote:
1. may be sent to another part of the country to study a different species.
What the hell does this mean ? There are only 8 species in the world & we only have 2 within the lower 48.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News