re: Evidence showing the SEC schedule bias for Alabama and Auburn

quote:

---

Hey, Mr. conspiracy guy, which of these scenarios makes more sense to the unbiased fan ? Since Bama was due to play Vanderbilt but couldn't, they should play Kentucky which is more in line with Vanderbilt , seeing as how Kentucky is right behind UGA. Or , Bama should play Georgia this year, even though they were supposed to get Vanderbilt , we want Bama to play UGA instead so the SEC offices must be bias. Have you ever considered that the most fair way would be.... 2013 Kentucky 2014 UGA 2015 VANDY Since it was scheduled to be... 2013 VANDY 2014 UGA 2015 Kentucky !!!!!!!! Are you serious man ?

---

But, but, but its all cyclical is what Bama fans have been saying about the permanent opponents. Teams go up and down. At least thats how they justify LSU being paired with florida and Bama gets Tennessee every year. Now, when its convenient for Bama, we are allowed to look at the current state of programs when making the schedules? (Is that what you mean by "more in line with" or do you mean the order of alternating opponents?)
Im no expert, but the way it looks is Bama was due to play Georgia and the schedule makers tweaked it to play UK instead, and swapped Georgia onto LSU's schedule instead of UK. And it looks even worse knowing the schedule makers (and the SEC)have interests in Bama succeeding.