- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why all this controvery about the Man of Steel ending *SPOILERS*
Posted on 6/26/13 at 8:29 am to Ace Midnight
Posted on 6/26/13 at 8:29 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
That's just "modern" filmmmaking. They have to justify these budgets, so they have to destroy a city with a lot of nausea-inducing, fakish, cartoony CGI (although MoS was fairly well done).
This sounds so crotchety
2
Posted on 6/26/13 at 8:44 am to DMagic
I think Synder said that the killing of Zod will set up the sequels for Superman to question his method. IMO, moving forward, you'll see the "old" Superman who doesn't want to kill anyone.
Posted on 6/26/13 at 8:47 am to DMagic
quote:
This sounds so crotchety
I call them like I see them.
Snyder is not on my "trusted" filmmaker list, but Nolan is. I gave the movie a chance. I give it a C minus. It would have been better if it cut down on the unnecessarily extended CGI scenes and not made the Kryptonians look like members of the Brotherhood of Steel from the Fallout game series.
Likewise, Jackson is on my trusted filmmaker list - he could have made The Hobbit better by severely cutting the Goblin mine battle (or eliminating it altogether, Game of Thrones-style).
It is what it is.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News