Started By
Message

re: SEC schedule argument...

Posted on 5/21/13 at 3:12 pm to
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
26721 posts
Posted on 5/21/13 at 3:12 pm to
quote:

SEC SCHEDULE ARGUMENT SOLVED!

Don't count the permanent opponent games for divisional titles.

And when you go to a nine game schedule, you will still have 8 games to determine divisional titles.

You're Welcome!


We've already brought up counting only divisional games. You want us to go to a 9 game schedule so OSU doesn't have competition in the CFP.

After OSU and Michigan, the Big Ten is the Big Ton as in "big ton of shite". We(SEC) have 6 teams that could match up with any top 2 teams in any conference.
Posted by Sheetbend
Member since Apr 2013
1267 posts
Posted on 5/21/13 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

We've already brought up counting only divisional games.


You don't get it.

Presently you have two cross-divisional games, so you count the one that rotates but don't count the permanent one for divisional titles.

When you go to a 9 game schedule, you get an extra cross-divisional game that also rotates and counts towards divisional titles.

Ignoring the 9th game, what is wrong with not counting the permanent opponent game for division titles?

Is there a Tiger fan with half a brain that can answer my question?
This post was edited on 5/21/13 at 5:24 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram