- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
New York State Pension Value Rises to Record High $160.4 Billion
Posted on 5/13/13 at 6:56 pm
Posted on 5/13/13 at 6:56 pm
Posted on 5/14/13 at 7:12 am to HNTIGER1980
Says absolutely nothing about the state's funded status, which is being calculated with a ~8% discount rate.
That story looks like it was sent directly from the NYSCRF to Bloomberg.
That story looks like it was sent directly from the NYSCRF to Bloomberg.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 8:17 am to BennyAndTheInkJets
quote:
Says absolutely nothing about the state's funded status, which is being calculated with a ~8% discount rate
Guide me here, Im not a finance expert. What does that mean?
Posted on 5/14/13 at 8:55 am to BennyAndTheInkJets
quote:
Says absolutely nothing about the state's funded status,
I think that was the point. To imply that it was maybe even overfunded. It's a feel good story that I'm not buying. Especially in New York.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 10:54 am to HNTIGER1980
quote:
Guide me here, Im not a finance expert. What does that mean?
So the main purpose of their pension plan is to pay benefits, their benefits are their liabilities. What pension accounting does is it takes what your expected returns are and discounts your future liabilities by a certain rate. The notion is that you will be able to earn that return to pay for the future liabilities. Your funded status is the ratio of your assets to your discounted liabilities.
What is crazy is that corporate pension plans must discount on the Citi AA corporate curve, which reflects current market rates (except that they smoothed that a little bit last year with the MAP-21 legislation). The idea is that you earn what the market gives you, which generally is correct. Public pension plans do not have the same discounting number, they basically just pick a magic number that they expect to return (usually about 8%) and discount liabilities that way. The higher your rate is, the lower your liabilities are. Public pensions are already massively underfunded, even given very high return assumptions. If they had to discount based on market rates, funded statuses would get A LOT higher. And I mean A LOT.
This is another example of why its hilarious that politicians criticize corporations. Corporate pensions are governed by ERISA and PBGC and require certain contributions when funded status gets low enough. Public plans are supposed to but politicians have time to time just not made the contribution (looking at you Chicago).
BTW, New York state is absolutely underfunded.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 11:33 am to BennyAndTheInkJets
We bash insurance companies when they arbitrarily state high expected returns in hypotheticals given to potential policy holders and we even enact law to prevent it (if I remember right), yet we allow this to happen. I don't get it.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 1:40 pm to Broke
Politicians are hipocrits and regulators are given jobs by politicians. If you have the ability to write laws for yourself, you're bound to give yourself a little more leeway than if you're writing laws for other people.
Posted on 5/14/13 at 3:05 pm to Broke
quote:
We bash insurance companies when they arbitrarily state high expected returns in hypotheticals given to potential policy holders and we even enact law to prevent it (if I remember right)
Any hypothetical rate must be accompanied by a 0% annual gross return as well.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News