Started By
Message

re: Draft Picks Review

Posted on 4/29/13 at 4:07 pm to
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 4:07 pm to
I answered in great detail a while back his situation with Oakland and Cleveland even providing links.

He runs some 2-gap so Jenkins will get used, but he runs primarily a 1-gap press man attacking scheme with the SS in the box.

He switches it up a good bit like GW did, but if we are talking base defense, that's what it is. That's why Jenkins makes sense and that's why keeping both Harper and M. Jenkins can makes sense even with Vaccaro.
Posted by landrywasbeast30
Member since Nov 2011
4904 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 4:09 pm to
In Oakland, he had guys like Ted Washington and 337 pound Terell Sands. Not exactly the kind of guys you are talking about. You will bring up Sapp, but Sapp played DE. We've had this argument before. Burgess was an OLB, even though he is listed at DE. If you go to pro-football-reference and click on Burgess' name, it says "DE-LB". Plus, you bring up Oakland, but you have argued before that he ran a 4-3 in Oakland. Make up your mind.

Personally, I don't think you know what you are talking about. You just click on links that show the depth charts, and that's how you form your opinions. Even though people who actually watched the Raiders play know they ran a 3-4 with guys like Ted Washington at NT, Sapp and Tommy Kelly at DE, and Burgess at OLB. Their roster fits the same type of players as traditional 3-4 players.
This post was edited on 4/29/13 at 4:15 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram