Started By
Message

re: Pat yasinkas analysis of the NFC south draft

Posted on 4/28/13 at 10:38 am to
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 4/28/13 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Meh, had we taken Jones his article would have sounded something like this..

"Saints take a pass rushing linebacker who has question marks while they still neglect to address the safety position".
Yup. He routinely finds was to negatively criticize most of the moves we make.

Risky? It would have been far more risky to take a guy with medical issues and a poor work ethic. Vaccaro was the safe pick. The risk about not having guys for the scheme is false. Sure you can always use more pass rushers, but the cupboard is far from bare.
This post was edited on 4/28/13 at 10:39 am
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64678 posts
Posted on 4/28/13 at 10:54 am to
quote:

Risky? It would have been far more risky to take a guy with medical issues and a poor work ethic.


Was just gonna post this
How the hell does he claim Vacarro to be moreof a risk than JJ?
Dude writes out his arse sometimes. Our pic at 15 is the very essence of a "safe pic".
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram