- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: lamb chops/rack question
Posted on 4/3/13 at 11:54 am to NaturalBeam
Posted on 4/3/13 at 11:54 am to NaturalBeam
quote:
So you didn't say the above? Or you said that after covering and resting for 10 minutes, the temp was still 125, after you had cooked it to 125?
That's exactly what I said. I said that 125-130 is medium rare. When I took it out at 125 and covered it loosely with foil and let it rest, the temp was then 130...which was perfect. Cooking to 140 (which is what you suggested), then letting it rest...even going up in 5 degrees (although you are saying it would go up 10-15 degrees in that time), it would still be overcooked. Don't take my word for it. Ask any chef. This board is used as a means to help others with cooking and to give suggestions and feedback. You suggested cooking to 140. I said by the time it rested, it wouldn't be medium rare. To each his own.
This post was edited on 4/3/13 at 11:56 am
Posted on 4/3/13 at 12:15 pm to nikinik
I never said cook it to 140 - I said that if you cooked it to 125, then covered and rested, you would wind up with meat around 140. Obviously if you cook it to 140, cover and rest, you will have over-done meat.
The meat I use easily rises 10 degrees, sometimes 15. Oh well
The meat I use easily rises 10 degrees, sometimes 15. Oh well
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News