Started By
Message

re: PC Discussion - Gaming, Performance and Enthusiasts

Posted on 9/2/14 at 12:32 pm to
Posted by ILikeLSUToo
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2008
18018 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

EDT: You would have done better with no iGPU if buying an APU, the iGPU will be auto disabled when using the PCI-E for graphics. You aren't going iTX but mATX, so i'm confused why an APU is even included in this form factor with a dedicated GPU.


He read a guide, probably written by LoL players, and as we know many of these hardcore I-only-play-one-game folks are not hardware savvy. The $70 Pentium G3258 would've given him better CPU performance because of its superior single core performance. LoL only uses 2 cores, so whether he chooses an FX or A8 or A10, the IPC will pretty much yeild the same performance in a game like LoL because of its limited CPU utilization, unless he decides to stream, in which case AM3+ and 8300 would've been the way to go.
This post was edited on 9/2/14 at 12:44 pm
Posted by LSU Coyote
Member since Sep 2007
53719 posts
Posted on 9/2/14 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

The $70 Pentium G3258 would've given him better CPU performance because of its superior single core performance. LoL only uses 2 cores, so whether he chooses an FX or A8 or A10, the IPC will pretty much yeild the same performance in a game like LoL because of its limited CPU utilization, unless he decides to stream, in which case AM3+ and 8300 would've been the way to go.

Yeah, but even the IPC for FX chips is higher than the Richland A8 he picked out.

UltimateHog, if you aren't going iTX, no truely logical reason can be reached using an APU on a full board and dedicated GPU.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram