- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: PC Discussion - Gaming, Performance and Enthusiasts
Posted on 3/19/24 at 11:15 am to Joshjrn
Posted on 3/19/24 at 11:15 am to Joshjrn
quote:
If the card isn’t heat soaking to begin with, you won’t see any benefit from UV and instead should just use a more traditional OC.
It doesn't seem like it is. The clock speed didn't dip at all during any of the tests.
Posted on 3/19/24 at 12:33 pm to SaintEB
quote:
It doesn't seem like it is. The clock speed didn't dip at all during any of the tests.
If you're not seeing clock sag, an UV won't do anything for you. If you want to play with it, start pushing an OC. Eventually, you'll either reach clock instability or temperature induced clock sagging. If you hit the former first, then you know your card's limits. If you hit the latter first, you can play with an "undervolt" from there and see how far it will take you.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)