Started By
Message

re: Assassin's Creed 3 ending (spoilers)

Posted on 2/5/13 at 10:55 am to
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 2/5/13 at 10:55 am to
But Connor was severely injured as well, just seems like Lee could have secured a pistol and laid in wait, or would that be more of an Assassin's kill than a Templar's?

quote:

The Templar Order is concerned with control over base passions

Would you say that is the reason Waytham didn't attempt to kill Connor earlier, rather than the fact that he was his son?
Posted by Muppet
Member since Aug 2007
50512 posts
Posted on 2/5/13 at 12:31 pm to
I just assume that Lee had some revelation between leaving Connor for dead and stumbling into that tavern.

It's perplexing that they took the subtle approach with that subplot but had Haytham monologue for 3 minutes after a fatal neck wound. What a bipolar game.
Posted by Brian Wilson
Member since Mar 2012
2080 posts
Posted on 2/5/13 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Waytham


Haytham.

Sorry, it was bugging me.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram