re: Did Louisville Once Again Expose the Elite SEC Defenses?

quote:

---

21 isn't a good score because of the turnovers. How in the world aren't you comprehending this?

---

And how are you not getting our game plan was to get them to throw so much that we had those opportunities to force turnovers? If they were able to move at will against us as you claim, why could they not finish the job?

quote:

---

I seem to remember LSU having a dominant defense back in the day and not "giving up the underneath" to the tune of 500+ yards.

---

And Geno Smith and co were definitely the opponents for those games... except that's not the case. WVU last year had a prolific offense, and we kept them out of the endzone better than most.

quote:

---

Now there are different type of turnovers? This is getting cute.

---

In terms of sloppy turnovers versus forced turnovers, yes. In terms of the end result, no. Don't be stupid.

quote:

---

WVU treated Clemson like a $2 whore at a Mexican donkey show, what's that got to do with what we're talking about? Atleast WVU was able to take down Clemson unlike LSU.

---

Yawn. Enjoy your opportunity to talk shite to us. Lord knows the opportunity barely comes around.